Independent scientific review ensuring source accuracy and claim integrity.
Aureobasidium.org Editorial Team · Independent
The Scientific Reviewer provides independent oversight of all scientific content published on Aureobasidium.org. The role ensures that every factual claim accurately reflects the source study — and that the strength of evidence is never overstated.
The Scientific Reviewer’s responsibilities include:
All primary educational pages — including What is Beta Glucan?, the FAQ, and topic-based research hubs — are reviewed before publication and re-reviewed quarterly. The Scientific Reviewer checks all source citations, mechanistic claims, and evidence summaries.
Individual study entries in the Research Archive are reviewed for accurate metadata, correct DOI attribution, and faithful AI-generated summaries. The Scientific Reviewer spot-checks archive entries on a rolling basis and performs full reviews when new study batches are added.
When errors are identified — whether by the internal team, readers, or through retraction notices — the Scientific Reviewer determines the appropriate correction and verifies that updated content is accurate before republication.
The Scientific Reviewer operates independently of any commercial interests. There is no financial relationship between the reviewer and any supplement manufacturer, distributor, or product vendor. The reviewer’s role is to ensure accuracy and integrity — not to advocate for or against any product or finding.
Note: Full biographical details for editorial team members are maintained privately in accordance with our privacy policy. The Scientific Reviewer’s domain expertise covers immunology and molecular biology, with specific focus on polysaccharide immunomodulation and β-glucan receptor biology.